• 455 Martinson, Los Angeles
  • 8 (043) 567 - 89 - 30
  • support@email.com

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Introduction To Online Jobs In Pakistan and Earning Money From Home

New Songs 2016 Pakistan Super League 2016 Live Streaming

Blackberry dark every year a little more. Once one of the main actors of the mobility market, the Canadian company nearly fell into anonymity with only 600,000 smartphones elapsed in the first quarter 2016. When such a crisis occurs, the ads tend to multiply. John Chen, CEO of Blackberry said there only a few months, that production of smartphones could totally cease to move on software solutions if it did not sell 5 million devices in 2016.

To achieve this figure and probably given the difficulties of Priv, the brand will launch two new phones he has this year confessed during an interview with the Saudi daily TheNational, range of environments to attract businesses? John Chen said that the commercial failure of the Priv (first Android smartphone of the brand) was not due to its intrinsic quality, but its price positioning, evidenced by our test. Available in France from 799 euros, few companies have wanted to invest as much ...

These two new smartphones will be positioned at a more attractive price, mid-range. Some advertise a price of around 400 euros. One would be in a standard format full-touch, the other would have a physical keyboard. That's all we know for now. The FBI vs. Apple case is over, but the issue of encryption of data and the implementation of backdoor is still wide open. In a position adopted on April 7 and published on 8, the National Commission on Informatics and Liberties (CNIL) expressed support data encryption. It is even a "vital element of our security," said the independent administrative authority.

It allows it according to "protect the people and their privacy to ensure their human rights" and of course "to protect the information of States and businesses," among other things. She recalled in passing that the protection of such data is guaranteed by Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Apart from these considerations, the CNIL also state its position legally, adding that already exists in France and Europe a legal framework "established" for the operation of equipment in judicial proceedings. This includes "the interception of correspondence" and "computer data capture on the screen or typed in" and the use of technical experts.

Moreover French criminal law may force companies holding disclosure to the authorities. It also helps to encourage third parties to provide information if they have them, the fines for non-cooperation have also been revised upwards recently. Impossible however to require the offending person to provide the information itself; the right not to incriminate oneself is fundamental and recognized the European Court of Human Rights. So Isabelle Falque-Pierrotin, President of the CNIL, quoted by AFP on Challenges, believes that the creation of backdoors or stolen doors is "not a good solution." If it recognizes a potential advantage in special cases "collective systemic effects of a device of this type would be extremely negative in terms of weakening this infrastructure." Clearly, and as most simply said Tim Cook, it would set a dangerous precedent.

An analysis shared by the National Agency of computer security (ANSSI) through the voice of its director Guillaume Poupard explained that in January the creation of backdoors tantamount to "shooting itself in the foot". The vulnerabilities could according to him "be exploited by our enemies", while they themselves could continue to use other encrypted services. Still, this opposition is obviously not to the liking of authorities who might find useful information in their investigations, the question is whether to "slay the righteous with the wicked, so that the righteous should be as the sinner "? The president of the CNIL simply replied: "it is not because the security imperative is reinforced that we must abandon our freedoms."

If we buy a tablet now it would c is the iPad that we would choose. But if we already had the previous generation, the iPad Air 2, we would not let us not attempt unless you have really useful drawing functions offered excellent Pencil stylus (sold separately for 109 euros ). We wrote this on an iPad Pro 9.7 with its Smart Keyboard for an airplane trip. And if that keyboard is not backlit, it remains comfortable. Moreover, the screen is still as clear, bright and easy to read. We can work, play, watch movies. This tablet is very convenient. We already use for a while iPad Air 2 associated with a keyboard Belkin. We write a lot on it, or to take notes or in troubleshooting when we do not have our laptop in hand. Despite Apple's discourse that presents him as the future of computing, the iPad is not a real alternative to the laptop. For example, we can not comfortably use it to cover a press conference by writing and editing content from our publishing interface via a web browser. We can not use our videoconferencing software or even enter our expense in the company's accounting system based on Java. The iPad remains stubbornly separate Mac and is less versatile than Windows terminal.

The iPad as close to perfection

All these disadvantages appear to contradict the word "Pro" attached to this new iPad. And yet, if we had to choose the iPad as close to perfection, it is for this that we would opt. This really is the smallest and most mobile productivity tool that Apple provides. He takes all the positives of the huge 12.9-inch iPad Pro last year (the excellent stylus, four speakers), and more, all in the same format as the iPad Air 2. it receives more efficient image sensors: 12 megapixel camera / video rear with flash and video Ultra HD / 4K; 5 megapixel front camera with flash system Retina. We can discuss the importance of having a powerful camera on a tablet, but it can still be useful, especially for scanning documents on the fly. The screen is also fantastic. Its resolution is the same as the iPad Air 2, but it is brighter and less prone to glare. It continuously adjusts the color temperature according to the light environment. Result, use both inside and outside has improved significantly. However, there are some small drawbacks compared the iPad Pro XL version. The new model is equipped with the same processor A9X, but it ranks behind the 12.9 inches on the test benches. However the difference is imperceptible. Its RAM is 2GB 4GB against its big brother. We did not feel discomfort at this level, but it could happen in the future insofar RAM helps a lot to multitasking performance. We guess that these choices were made to drawing to avoid the iPad 9.7 comes not compete directly with the 12.9-inch model.

That said, although it is less expensive than the big iPad Pro, it is still more expensive than most other tablets. And prices climb quickly if one opts for the Wi-Fi version + cellular connection with the keyboard and stylus. According to Apple, the battery life is equivalent to that of the iPad Air 2 and iPad Pro 12.9-inch or 10 hours. During our test, we rarely consumed more than 50% of the battery in a day. Why the iPad Pro iPad over another? Why choose this iPad Pro rather than an iPad Air 2, the price dropped? Because it is more versatile and simply better. And compatibility with the new system Pencil sensitive to pressure level is really a plus for those working in the design or want to draw with tools like those proposed by Adobe or its FiftyThree with Paper application. However, for everyday use, we always recommend the iPad Air 2. This model is largely competent for most needs: write, make multitasking and even draw with a stylus. Rates begin at 439 euros to which must be added the purchase of the keyboard and stylus.

No comments:

Post a Comment